Case Study #12 “When HR words and actions don’t match”
Linking HR to organizational vision – Expert Witness
Situation: A 77 year old Sales Representative is terminated by the national firm. When pursuing his interests in the courts, the former employee and attorney receive confusing and conflicting information and deposition statements.
Action: Dave is engaged to explain the material provided.
Result: Dave is able to identify multiple inconsistencies among the personal and corporate statements vs. the documents and actions taken by the employer. Based upon Dave’s insight, the wronged former employee is able to submit arguments to the court to justify continuing to trial.